Posted by Siseko Tapile
10 Comments
When William Samoei Ruto, President of Kenya ordered security forces to target demonstrators' legs on July 9 2025, the country’s simmering unrest boiled over into a deadly showdown that left at least 16 people dead and roughly 400 injured.
The carnage unfolded across Kenya as a wave of Generation Z activists marked the one‑year anniversary of the June 2024 anti‑tax protests that began in Nairobi. Young Kenyans, who make up about 75 % of the population, flooded streets, social media feeds, and university campuses demanding President Ruto’s resignation.
The story started in June 2024 when the government unveiled a Finance Bill that would tax everyday items—bread, fuel, even mobile‑money transfers. The bill was part of an International Monetary Fund‑backed plan to raise US$2.7 billion in revenue. Already fragile public trust evaporated after Rex Masai, a 19‑year‑old protester, was shot dead by police on June 20 2024.
That killing sparked a massive march on Parliament on June 25 2024, with more than 100 000 people demanding the bill’s withdrawal. Security forces responded with tear gas, rubber bullets, and live ammunition, killing three demonstrators that day. Under mounting pressure, President Ruto pulled the Finance Bill on June 26 2024, but the crackdown left a deep scar.
Fast forward a year, and the anger resurfaced. On July 7 2025, police opened fire on crowds in at least six cities. Official tallies show 38 dead and 130 injured that single day, but human‑rights monitors suspect the real numbers are higher.
Boniface Kariuki, a 22‑year‑old mask vendor became the face of the tragedy after a video showed officers firing point‑blank at him in Nairobi. The clip went viral, fueling outrage and prompting Amnesty International Kenya to warn of a "trust deficit" between citizens and security forces.
Adding to the horror, the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights documented armed criminal gangs collaborating with police, turning what could have been a standard crowd‑control operation into an orchestrated massacre.
Two days after the July 7 bloodshed, President Ruto took to national television. He declared a "war on the protests" and instructed law‑enforcement officers to "shoot protesters' legs so they break and they can go to hospital on their way to court." The chilling directive was a stark escalation, signaling that the state was prepared to weaponize pain as a deterrent.
Critics argue the order violates Kenya’s constitution, which guarantees the right to peaceful assembly. Legal scholars from the University of Nairobi highlighted that such a policy could be classified as torture under international law.
Since the crackdown, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights has logged over 500 arrests, many of them minors. Their reports detail cases of extrajudicial killings, beatings, and intimidation of witnesses.
Amnesty International Kenya’s spokesperson, Zaina Kombo, told Channel 4 News, "We already had a trust deficit, but this deeply entrenched the trust deficit between citizens and security officials because then it means that even when you're arrested, the people who are meant to give you protection in a cell could as well just turn wild and do something like that."
The funerals of victims—most notably Boniface Kariuki on July 11 2025—have turned into political rallies, with mourners chanting slogans that call for Ruto’s resignation and an end to foreign‑imposed austerity measures.
Analysts see three possible trajectories. First, the government could double down, expanding the state of emergency and further curbing media freedoms. Second, sustained international pressure—especially from the IMF and European donors—might force Ruto to roll back the harsh tactics and initiate an independent inquiry.
Third, the protests could evolve into a broader movement demanding constitutional reforms, echoing the 2007‑2008 post‑election crisis but driven by a digitally native generation. If the latter materializes, Kenya could see a shift in political power dynamics that reshapes East African politics for years to come.
The United Nations Human Rights Office issued a statement on July 15 2025 calling the killings "potential crimes against humanity" and urging Kenya to ensure accountability. Meanwhile, the IMF postponed a scheduled review of its loan program, signaling concern over the instability.
Western embassies in Nairobi have offered to monitor the situation, but critics argue that diplomatic rhetoric often stalls while on‑the‑ground violence continues.
With 75 % of Kenyans under 35, the heavy‑handed response fuels fear, job insecurity, and a loss of trust in institutions. Many students have postponed exams, while others are joining underground activist networks, increasing the risk of further clashes.
The bill sought to levy taxes on staple goods—bread, fuel, and mobile‑money transfers—to meet a US$2.7 billion IMF loan condition. Citizens saw it as a burden on the poorest and a symbol of foreign interference, sparking nationwide demonstrations.
Key actors include Amnesty International Kenya, the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, and local NGOs like Socialist Alternative, all providing on‑the‑ground reports and video evidence.
If domestic courts act independently, officers could face charges ranging from unlawful killings to crimes against humanity. International bodies, however, may intervene only if Kenya fails to conduct credible investigations.
The IMF has paused certain disbursements while urging Kenya to restore stability and respect human rights. Continued unrest could jeopardize the remaining US$2.7 billion funding, pressuring the government to negotiate.
Comments
J T
Ruto's leg‑shooting order is straight up barbaric 😡
October 15, 2025 at 22:59
A Lina
The Kenyan government's recent draconian directive constitutes a flagrant violation of both domestic constitutional safeguards and international human‑rights norms.
By mandating that law‑enforcement officers target the lower limbs of demonstrators, the state is effectively institutionalizing a form of punitive incapacitation.
This policy undermines the principle of proportionality that undergirds legitimate use‑of‑force doctrines.
Moreover, the selective application of such a measure reveals a discriminatory bias against the Gen‑Z demographic that comprises three‑quarters of the population.
The jurisprudential ramifications are profound, as the Kenyan Constitution explicitly guarantees freedom of peaceful assembly and protection against cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
Internationally, the United Nations Convention Against Torture, to which Kenya is a signatory, obligates the state to prevent practices that amount to torture or cruel treatment.
Empirical evidence from the July 7 and July 9 crackdowns evidences a statistically significant escalation in casualty rates relative to prior protest episodes.
The epidemiological data, albeit censored, suggests that the leg‑targeting tactic increased the risk of permanent mobility impairments among protestors.
In addition, the opaque collaboration between police units and criminal gangs, as documented by the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, erodes the rule of law.
The fiscal impetus behind the Finance Bill-namely compliance with IMF conditionalities-does not justify the externalization of violence onto civilians.
Economists have long warned that austerity measures imposed under structural adjustment programs can precipitate sociopolitical destabilization.
Consequently, the Ruto administration's decision to double down on repressive tactics fuels a feedback loop of dissent and state violence.
Civil society actors, including Amnesty International Kenya, have issued stark warnings that the current trajectory could culminate in crimes against humanity.
Legal scholars from the University of Nairobi have already petitioned the High Court for an injunction against the leg‑shooting directive.
Failure to comply with such judicial orders would set a pernicious precedent, effectively normalizing state‑sanctioned bodily harm as a tool of political coercion.
October 18, 2025 at 06:33
Virginia Balseiro
Yo, the whole scene feels like a battlefield straight out of a dystopian series! The youths are not just protesting any more; they're fighting for their future, their jobs, their dignity. When you see videos of cops aiming for knees, it's pure horror mixed with absurdity. The international community needs to step up, not just with statements but with real pressure on the IMF. If the money keeps flowing while people bleed, we're complicit.
October 20, 2025 at 14:06
Jared Mulconry
I get that emotions are running high, but maybe a mediated town‑hall could de‑escalate things. Bringing together student leaders, NGOs, and government reps might surface compromises that avoid bloodshed. Even if the trust deficit is wide, a neutral facilitator could bridge it. Peaceful negotiation should be the priority before any more lives are lost.
October 22, 2025 at 21:39
Brandon Rosso
It is incumbent upon all stakeholders to pursue a sustainable resolution that safeguards civil liberties whilst addressing fiscal imperatives. The Kenyan administration would benefit from transparent dialogue with civil society, thereby restoring public confidence. Moreover, the IMF should condition disbursements on demonstrable human‑rights compliance. Such an approach could catalyze both economic stability and societal cohesion.
October 25, 2025 at 05:13
Tracee Dunblazier
Honestly, the government's heavy‑handed tactics are a textbook case of state overreach. By choosing to cripple protesters rather than engage, they reveal a profound disconnect from the citizenry. This is not just a policy blunder; it's an ethical crisis that demands immediate redress.
October 27, 2025 at 12:46
Edward Garza
Another day, another authoritarian playbook – deploy pain, silence dissent, repeat.
October 29, 2025 at 20:19
Allen Rodi
For anyone looking to follow the developments, the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights has a live tracker on their website. Also, Amnesty International Kenya posted a detailed PDF report with eyewitness accounts. Sharing these sources can help keep the narrative accurate.
November 1, 2025 at 03:53
Jody Webster
Well… I guess we’re all just watching a repeat of history??? The government’s “solution” is literally shooting legs… what’s next???
November 3, 2025 at 11:26
Steve Goodger
Friends, it is crucial to understand that the turmoil we are witnessing is not an isolated incident but part of a larger tapestry of systemic challenges that have been simmering for years. The intersection of external financial pressures, domestic policy missteps, and youthful aspirations creates a volatile environment that can easily tip into violence if not addressed holistically. By fostering inclusive dialogues that prioritize the voices of students, labor groups, and marginalized communities, Kenya can chart a path toward equitable reform. Moreover, the international community must recognize its role in shaping fiscal policies that sometimes prioritize repayment over human welfare. If we collectively demand accountability and transparency, we may prevent future escalations. The resilience shown by Kenyan youths is a testament to their commitment to a better future, and it deserves our unwavering support. Let us amplify their calls for justice, not merely as observers but as active allies.
November 5, 2025 at 18:59